Make AI governance usable

An ivory walkway curves between translucent green guardrails with a clear side junction.

Clear guidance helps people make decisions at the moment they need to make them.

Start with familiar situations

Translate broad principles into the questions people encounter: which tools may be used, what information may be entered, and which outputs need review. Give examples of permitted work and situations that need another decision. Keep those examples close to the workflow, where people can find them without searching through a long policy document.

Match review to the consequences

Consider the information involved, the reach of the output, and the actions the system can take. A tool used to explore an internal idea raises different operational questions from one that changes customer records. Make the review route understandable and name the person or team who can resolve uncertainty.

Editorial illustration of separate forms becoming an ordered sequence.
Practical governance makes the permitted route and the route for escalation easy to understand.

Keep a useful inventory

Record the purpose, owner, dependencies, and current status of each system at a level the organisation can maintain. Connect that record to evaluations and operational decisions where appropriate. The inventory should help answer practical questions during a change or incident, rather than become a separate reporting exercise with no clear user.

Review the guidance with users

Ask where people hesitate, where the process creates unnecessary work, and which situations the examples do not cover. Use that feedback to improve the guidance. A workable approach gives people a clear route to responsible use and a clear route to ask for help.

In summary

Make guidance specific to familiar situations, match review to the consequences, and keep a useful system inventory. Give people a clear route to make a decision or ask for help.

Keep reading

View all